Trust Deed and IVA debt
Tuesday, 26 June 2012
Families Struggle to Make Ends Meet
Monday, 25 June 2012
Risky Baines & Ernest Debt Scheme
Friday, 20 April 2012
help from a debt charity
Don’t Fret About Debt
For many individuals due to many different reasons they find themselves in an almost impossible situation. They are in debt and they can see no way off paying it back.
Our advice is simple don’t fret, there are many different reasons why people find themselves in debt it can be redundancy, ill health, divorce the list is endless. Though the effect of debt can affect people in similar ways our advice is seek help as soon as you realise you are struggling with your debt, we all want to mange it and nobody wants to pay somebody to sort it out for them, however if we seek debt advice early enough we may have more options available to us at that stage.
In the first instance you want to speak to a charity people that are not there to gain anymore from you but will offer free debt advice. We recommend speaking to a debt charity.
In order for anyone to be able to give you the correct advice they will need to gain some information from you, they will want to know how much debt you have, how much income you have and how much expenditure you have. They will also enquire about any assets you may have. It is at this stage they will be able to offer you the best advice to suit your own personnel situation.
The advice varies from person to person as each personnel situation has to be taken into account. It could be for some they are missing out in benefits which they are entitled to, for others they may be advised to negotiate with their creditors and make token payments until they can get themselves back on their feet.
A Debt management plan may be an option which is an informal arrangement between you and your creditors in which you repay all the debt though over a longer period of time.
An IVA is another option where you repay a percentage of your debt and at the end of the term the rest is written off.
Bankruptcy is recommended when you have no disposable income and are unable to repay your debt.
For any of the above solutions you need to be aware of the impact they will have on your credit rating and that will last for six years.
Before entering any solution you must be aware of all the advantages and the disadvantages before you sign.
If you do find yourself fretting about debt call a debt advice charity they will offer you friendly advice and make you aware of the best way for you to become debt free.
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
Family Allowance Cuts to Be ‘Watered Down’ After Tory Revolt.
After a Tory backlash controversial plans to cut child benefit for the better off are being watered down.
The Chancellor George Osborne plan was to remove child benefit from any household where one person earned enough to pay the higher tax rate. However he is now making way to change this.
Nick Clegg confirmed this morning that the government is looking again at the child benefits cuts due to the 'unintended consequences' of the plans at the moment.
Nick Clegg the Deputy Prime Minister said the Government believed it was right to ensure that those on the highest incomes bear their share of the burden of deficit reduction.
Nick Clegg told Sky News: 'We've also equally accepted that there's an issue about how you do that, so you make sure you don't create these unintended consequences where, say, a family with one upper-income earner get child benefit removed when there's another family with two income earners who collectively earn more but keep the benefits.'
The original figure which was just over £40,000 now looks as though it will be raised as high as £80,000 nearly double what was first indicated.
The change is due to come into force at the beginning of next year, however it emerged yesterday that the Chancellor had different options for softening the impact of the change.
His options included raising income to £50,000, higher rate tax payers only receiving half the amount of child benefit or making payments only to families where the children are under the age of five.
However in a Statement issued last night by the Treasury they made no reference to higher rate taxpayers, they instead focused on those earning more than £80,000.
A spokesperson for the treasury said: ‘It is not fair to ask someone earning £20,000 to pay for the child benefit that goes to someone earning £80,000 or £100,000.’
Critics say the current proposal will unfairly penalise families where the mother stays at home and Tory MPs are putting pressure on Mr Osborne to abandon his current proposals.
The current plan is that all families in which one parent earns more than the 40 per cent tax threshold which is currently £42,475 a year will lose all child benefit.
This would mean a couple with two children could lose more than £1,750 a year. However provided neither partner pays the higher rate of tax a couple who between them earn £80,000 would still receive full child benefit.
Critics last night said the options being considered did not go far enough.
Mark Reckless Tory MP said: ‘None of these proposals addresses the unfairness of single-earner couples with a stay at home parent losing their child benefit while two-earner households with much larger incomes keep theirs.’
The original plan was unveiled by Mr Osborne at the Conservative Party conference in October 2010.
David Cameron said in January: ‘We always said we would look at the way it’s implemented and that remains the case.’ This gave the first glimpse of a possible re think.
However with the £1 billion planned saving the treasury has warned that softening the blow will wipe out most of the savings.
‘If you are a two-earner family on £84,000 you keep it, but if you are a one-earner family with three kids on £42,000 you lose £2,500 – where is the fairness in that?’
Ed Balls, Shadow Chancellor
Today Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls will force a symbolic Commons vote on the issue thus adding to the pressure.
Yesterday Mr Balls told Sky News: ‘If you are a two-earner family on £84,000 you keep it, but if you are a one-earner family with three kids on £42,000 you lose £2,500 – where is the fairness in that?’
Labour will also attack plans to cut working tax credit on thousands of part time or low income families.
Under new proposal, which are to be introduced next month couples who qualify for tax credits will have to work a minimum of 24 hours instead of the current 16 hours.
Thursday, 23 February 2012
Parents Face A Fine For Taking Children On Holiday In Term Time
Friday, 17 February 2012
Edwina Currie Says "Just Go Bankrupt"
Edwina was invited onto the show because she believed people were no starving in the UK because of the austerity cuts. The author and broadcaster clashed with Hayley Sanderson after the young mother claimed to regularly go hungry to feed her children.
Mrs Currie suggested that by living a life which was too good was to blame for being in debt. 'When the money was coming in, this sounds like there were two salaries coming in, and no savings, and life was being lived to the full and a very good life indeed,' said former junior health secretary Mrs Currie in a Radio 5 Live phone-in yesterday.
'But when that’s no longer the case, when there’s no longer money coming in, you have to evaluate whether you are going to be able to get back to the good life quickly or not. In which case, you are going to have to think about maybe declaring yourselves bankrupt.'
The young mother was then reduced to tears when she told Mrs Currie she had no credit cards, catalogue debts or satellite television, hit back.
'Edwina, I’ve never lived life to the full. I don’t go out every weekend. You’ve really upset me,' she said, bursting into tear.
'We don’t buy clothes on a weekly basis. We’ve never lived life to the full.
'I never said I’ve borrowed money from anywhere. I’m paying off old bills like council tax.'
Mrs Currie, who was a Northfield councillor from 1975 to 1986 and appeared on Strictly Come Dancing last year, had also probed Ms Sanderson on whether she had any pets.
Bankruptcy Advice
Mrs Currie went on to say "I hate to say this but you need to go Bankrupt". Huh?!!
That's crazy to provide this advice without a complete income and expenditure and evaluating a person's situation. The austerity cuts mean people struggle to survive and weathy, ignorant people like Edwina who are completely out of touch should not be invited onto radio programmes for subjects as sensitive as this.
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Prediction that 400 Scots could go bankrupt every week in 2012
Sequestration (the Scottish term for bankruptcy) the firm predict that over 20,000 Scots will have entered this or a Protected Trust Deed (PTD) by the end of 2011 and that figure will continue to rise throughout 2012.
PKF predict a rise due to further cuts on the household budget; public sector cut backs, hours being cut and wages being frozen and no sign of an upturn in the economy.
The firm also warned that any increase in the base rate of interest would cause an alarming increase in the amount of homeowners going bankrupt.
A spokesperson for PKF said: “The dramatic rise in the number of more affluent Scots being made bankrupt is a further sign that the after effects of the recession are spreading among all sectors of society with the result that I believe all personal insolvencies will continue to rise and remain at high levels for several years to come.”
He also said since LILA came out in 2008 Scottish bankruptcies have steadily increased as many struggling Scots have taken advantage of this cheap way into bankruptcies when they have low assets and low income.
However recently these numbers have fallen and there is an increase in people entering a Protected Trust Deed .This they predict would peak in 2012 as job losses, overtime bans, no increase in wages and personnel circumstances all take their toll on the middle class in Scotland.
“People entering a Protected Trust Deed are more affluent as they have a disposable income and are able to pay something towards their debt“.
“Before the recession if these people were struggling with their debt they would release equity on the ever increasing property they owned , However nowadays property prices are stagnant and banks have a great reluctance to lend at such a volatile time“. This leaves many with little option.